The Global Warming Hoax, often portrayed as an unassailable scientific consensus, crumbles under scrutiny as a fabricated crisis designed for economic exploitation and regulatory control. Skeptics rightly highlight the Earth’s historical climate cycles—warming and cooling driven by solar activity, volcanic eruptions, and orbital variations—as evidence that current fluctuations are natural, not anthropogenic. These cycles are “normal and expected over geological timeframes,” yet alarmists dismiss them to attribute rapid changes solely to greenhouse gases, ignoring data showing no statistically significant sea-level acceleration in over a century. This selective interpretation isn’t oversight; it’s the foundation of a hoax that funnels trillions into mitigation schemes, as echoed in online discourse labeling it a “Russia Collusion Hoax”-style deception for leftist power grabs.

Delving deeper, perceived inconsistencies in climate models and data records expose the pseudoscience at the core. Critics point to adjusted temperature histories that cool the past to exaggerate modern warming, alongside failed predictions like ice-free Arctic summers or vanishing Maldives atolls—none of which materialised. The text concedes skeptics’ concerns over “inconsistencies” undermining credibility, yet defends “improved” models with peer-reviewed validation, a process tainted by funding biases favoring alarmism. Far from rigorous science, this is a rigged system where dissent is silenced as “denial,” enabling the narrative to persist as a tool for control, with social media users decrying it as a scam about “power, not weather.”

Economic arguments against global warming mitigation reveal the hoax’s predatory intent, prioritising elite enrichment over genuine growth. Opponents warn of job losses in fossil fuels and agriculture from draconian policies, a valid fear the text downplays by touting “new jobs” in renewables—subsidised black holes like Australia’s Central New South Wales REZ, which ballooned from $650 million to $5.5 billion, benefiting billionaires and foreign firms. Inaction costs from disasters? Overhyped and insured for profit, while the real transfer occurs via carbon taxes and ESG mandates, hiking energy prices for the masses. Fossil fuels have lifted billions from poverty; net-zero fantasies will impoverish them first, all under the guise of salvation.

Uncertainties in climate data further indict the urgency as manufactured fear-mongering. The alarmists acknowledge “scientific uncertainties” but insists risks like rising seas and habitat loss demand immediate action, rejecting a “wait-and-see” approach. Yet, with no evidence of unprecedented disaster frequency—many are cyclical, like recent floods—these hedges expose the grift: perpetual crisis justifies endless spending. Politically motivated narratives impose regulations and taxes as “liberty infringements,” with scientists advocating policies on “empirical evidence” that’s often cherry-picked. The 97% consensus? A myth from narrow surveys, evaporating under broader scrutiny, paving the way for globalist agendas from Davos to disaster funds.

Carbon credits epitomise this profit-making apparatus, a multi-billion-dollar scam riddled with fraud that diverts funds from real environmental gains. Designed to offset emissions via projects like reforestation, the system breeds “ghost credits”—overstated reductions from fake or preexisting initiatives, as in China’s €1 billion scheme where auditors rubber-stamped oilfield gas capture without site visits, enriching firms like Shell and Exxon. The EU’s €5 billion VAT carousel fraud exploited trading loopholes with shell companies, while U.S. cases like CQC’s cookstove overclaims issued millions of bogus offsets sold to Netflix and Meta. Verra-certified projects in Brazil and Kenya yield zero net benefits, often displacing indigenous communities in “carbon colonialism,” with scandals like Harvard’s junk credits highlighting elite complicity.

These interlocking scandals—from model manipulations to credit Ponzi schemes—paint global warming as the ultimate wealth transfer: taxpayers subsidise green bubbles for cronies like Mark Carney’s shuttered Net-Zero alliances, while communities suffer evictions and price hikes. Sovereign P4LO calls for “informed discourse” and not hollow amid suppressed debate and mounting exposures, including Kenya’s tender cancellations worth $19.6 million amid cartel allegations. As public outrage on platforms labels it a “multi-layered scam,” the path forward demands audits, not apologies—exposing the hoax to reclaim sovereignty from fear-driven predation.